About 7 years ago I was first introduced to Magic. Even though I didn’t understand most of the
cards, I knew that it was going to be a fun, spellbinding game. My mind started to race and I thought that
all trading card games (TCGs) must be as good as Magic, so I learned a couple
of other games and immediately I could tell that the “fun factor” just wasn’t
there. Magic is truly unique.
I’m no TCG expert and I’ve never designed a single card but
recently I’ve started looking at a few other TCGs. One of the goals of a good TCG is to make
each faction or color feel different.
Magic somehow makes red cards very “red”. Red cards feel angry, chaotic, and full of
randomness. Even the name often lets you
guess the color of the card. Making each
color feel and play differently is one of Magic’s greatest strengths.
The Marvel/DC VS System had too many factions. The VS System encouraged players to use one
or two factions by restricting group attacks to characters that have the same
faction. The problem was that the VS
System introduced too many factions.
Each new set had new factions and the previous factions only received a
few cards. The VS System was great
because it let you use all of the great superheroes but eventually it crumbled.
The Spoils provides an interesting twist on Magic’s combat. In the Spoils you can have many different
combat phases because each creature can attack separately. While this is just a small change, it
increases the number of decisions that a player has to make. (The Spoils only has 4 sets but let’s hope
that it doesn’t die. You can even play
it online using OCTGN, which is one of those programs that lets you play online
but doesn’t enforce the rules. You can
read more here.)
The Inuyasha TCG also has an interesting combat
mechanic. Each character has up to 3 attack
colors, out of a total of 5. Characters
can attack other characters only if the same color exists on both cards. This makes cards harder to evaluate. A character might have a green attack of 5
but a blue attack of 1. With this mechanic
card designers would need to be careful to make groups of characters feel
similar by using similar attack colors and values otherwise each character
would feel independent and random. For
example, maybe “good” characters would have high blue and green stats while “evil”
character have high white stats. (In Inuyasha
good versus evil characters are a major theme and Inuyasha is often depicted as
both “good” and “evil”.)
Lord of the Rings: The Card Game by Fantasy Flight Games
turns combat completely upside-down.
Instead of two people playing against each other, both people play
cooperatively (co-op) against an “encounter deck” that spits out enemy characters
and obstacles. Recently Fantasy Flight
Games bought the Star Wars license and plans to release a co-op Star Wars TCG. (In a co-op game if one or both of the
players beats the encounter deck, both players win.)
The one facet that Magic does better than anyone else is
that each set feels different. Each set
has a different world, theme, and conflict but sets are tied together by new
mechanics. Without a coherent theme, a
card set could easily become a random collection of cards (which is sometimes
how I feel when using Forge). Making
each set interesting is a very hard challenge but Wizards makes it look easy.
A TCG must be “fun” although there are hundreds of aspects
to “fun”. The TCG must feel “fair”, as
in both players have a chance to win. A
TCG must allow both players to interact and respond, otherwise you might as
well be playing a one-player game. Good
artwork never hurts and good TCGs need to be playtested for hundreds of hours.
Most TCGs burnout after a few years and stop being
produced. Only few TCGs last more than 5
years. This fact saddens me a little bit
but I guess that is how the world works.
In reality most individuals keep up with only 1 or 2 TCGs. Most people don’t have to time/effort/money
to take an interest in more than 2 TCGs.
Even keeping up with one game like Magic is more than enough for most
people.
In conclusion, maybe paper TCGs are dead? On the positive side there are a number of
free online TCGs and I’m sure some of them are very good. Here is a discussion about free online TCGs.
(Boardgamegeek.com is a great resource because it has rules and variations for almost every TCG, card and board game in existence.)
Keep on tapping,
mtgrares
p.s.
--When I say, “Maybe paper TCGs are dead?” I mean bringing a
new paper TCG to market seems impossibly hard compared with a cheaper-to-produce
TCG videogame that lets you play against the computer with a couple of hundred
cards.
Offline TCG videogames are my
favorite niche and even though they aren’t insanely popular, somebody could
still make a handsome profit. I know of
exactly five offline TCG videogames: Forge, Magic’s Duels of the Planeswalkers,
Shandalar (old Magic PC program), Marvel Trading Card Videogame, and Fullmetal Alchemist: Trading Card Game for Nintendo DS.
--I tried to understand the Netrunner TCG, which still has a
pretty strong following despite being 15 years old, but the rules flowchart
scared me to death. You can read the
rules and how to play online here.
Although I have never played them, the Pokemon and Yu-gi-oh! games on the Nintendo DS are always top-sellers, and the Pokemon games are usually the #1 game for the handhelds for an entire month after they are released. From what I understand, they play very similar to a paper tcg.
ReplyDeletedon't the 2 pokemon tcg games and the countless yu-gi-oh ones
ReplyDeleteI loved the Vampire: the Eternal Struggle. It was another brainchild of Richard Garfield but published by White Wolf, and was a brilliant mix of what I loved in MtG and new tactics. Unfortunately the reseller near me stopped selling them after I'd bought only 2 packs, but even with just those two it took a long time before my friends and I got bored with the limited pool. But eventually you knew what to expect so I've been looking for ways to play against an AI opponent since, but never found anything.
ReplyDeleteGreat insight. I myself have old collections of such TCGs like Vampire: The Etetnal Struggle, Middle-Earth, Harry Potter, Legend of the 5 rings and even Initial D (Car racing themed) and they were all fun while it lasted. The main wall that kills these publishers are funding. WoTC has always been bigger and I think owning the TSR world gave them access to a lot of art and story material
ReplyDelete.
Launching a new paper TCG now would be very challenging because of the established TCGs out there and enormous funding you'll need. That's also why we see a lot of virtual card games such as "Shadow Era" , "Cabals", "Kard Kombat/Orions". Easier to gain traction that way, the when it successful enough, maybe they can go on paper.
I wish thos small time TCGs were given a chance. MTG is undeniably the best to date due to its multitude of possibilities --- especially on vintage and it complexity further multiplies those said possibilities. If it weren't too expensive today as compared during the 90s, I'd probably still be playing.
My first TCG was the very first Yu-Gi-Oh for Gameboy Advance way back around 2000.
ReplyDeleteVampire: The Etetnal Struggle sounds very interesting. I did know that Magic creator Richard Garfield has created many other games like Vampire and Netrunner.
"I know of exactly five offline TCG videogames: Forge, Magic’s Duels of the Planeswalkers, Shandalar (old Magic PC program), Marvel Trading Card Videogame, and Fullmetal Alchemist: Trading Card Game for Nintendo DS."
ReplyDeleteCome on rares, certainly you can think of a few more? I know I can!
Huggybaby,
ReplyDeleteI couldn't think of any more, that is why I listed the games that I could think of. Maybe there is a hidden niche of offline TCG videogames somewhere on the net?
Just to add:
ReplyDeleteNetrunner was brilliant, and the most fun TCG I've ever played. And that's with having played Magic since 1994, and worked in a comic & game shop (i.e., rying everything on the market) in th late 199os TCG boom years.
I still have a couple of Netrunner decks tucked away behind the Magic cards, in hopes of getting someone to play a few games again someday.